Friday, July 3, 2015

Local Farming Can Feed Most of America

 The real limit is not land.  It is hands on deck to do the actual work and the design of a protocol that makes it all possible.  Even today organic farmers are held back by this a;though they have obviously made effective compromises.

We have spent fifty years depopulating the farm equation.  Now we need to reverse this process ,but  certainly not the way we did things in the past.  Folks forget that most of the damage to our farmland took place before industrial agriculture if they ever understood that.

Today we have access to power and more and more small power tools.  Eventually we will have a picking robot sporting several picking limbs able to pick anything without damage.  That same system will also suffice to pull weeds and do some grooming thus  minimizing human judgement.   

We will never get rid of human input simply because it does demand fine tuned judgement able to evolve with the problems.  We can avoid the drudgery and the heavy lifting as much as possible.  better a group can be operated as drones.

Local Farming Can Feed Most of America, Says New Study

By Annie Wu, Epoch Times | June 18, 2015

Farmers markets and farm-to-table restaurants are all the rage today. Food made from locally grown produce is considered more sustainable for the environment, and for the people who work the land.

While many health- and environment-conscious consumers are hungry for more. Locally grown food remains a niche market, with most of America’s food coming from large, industrial farms shipped over long distances to reach our supermarkets.

Conventionally grown produce travels an average of 1,494 miles from farm to point of sale, according to a study by the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture at Iowa State University.

But researchers at University of California–Merced, recently discovered that there’s potential for more of our food to be locally sourced.

Through conducting a mapping study, researchers found that most U.S. cities can feed 80 to 100 percent of their residents with food grown and raised on farmland within a 50-mile radius.

Some large coastal cities, like New York City, have limited local food capacity—farmland within 50 miles can only support about 10 percent of its population. But if the limits were expanded to 100 miles, New York’s surrounding farmland capacity grows to about 30 percent.

Professor Elliott Campbell and graduate student Andrew Zumkehr arrived at their calculations by first figuring out how many calories someone on a typical American diet would consume, then converting that number to a figure representing the number of agricultural crops and livestock numbers that would be required to produce those calories of food (they also did this for a vegetarian diet and a meat-heavy diet).

For livestock, they made calculations based on conventional farming practices, not grass-fed methods.

Then, they mapped out all the available farmland in the country using data from the National Science Foundation, and calculated the land’s productivity using USDA (Department of Agriculture) crop yield data.

Lastly, they created an algorithm to assign nearby farmland to each city, using 50 miles as a baseline limit. If there were overlap areas between the cities, they gave priority to cities with larger populations and smaller cropland resources—as a way to maximize the potential capacity.

Using census data for each city’s population, they found that 90 percent of the country’s food demand can be supplied from farmland within a 50-mile radius. One hundred percent of the country’s food demand can be met within a 200-mile radius.

If more Americans switched to a plant-based diet, farmland capacity can be stretched further; a meat-intensive diet requires three times as much land as a vegetarian diet, the researchers found.

In a phone interview, professor Campbell said the study was not meant to suggest that we make a wholesale switch to a food production system based entirely on local farming.

That would require a complete change in the way our food is distributed to markets, and in our preferences for what to eat.

Instead, the study results provide insight into how much more we could adopt local farming. For example, New York could probably source all its summer produce from nearby farms.

“The key thing about our study is, if we were to invest those resources, if more people were interested [in local farming], could we actually do this? The answer is yes,” Campbell said.

Currently, only a small percentage of the nation’s food is produced locally. This study shows that a significantly higher proportion can convert to local.

No comments:

There was an error in this gadget