Tuesday, December 23, 2014

World's Oldest Engravings Discovered on 500,000-Year-Old Shells

 

This is great news.  This had to be true, but proving it was always be a challenge.  It is even from the place it should be.


I made the conjecture a decade ago that tribal humanity first arose as part of a seaside culture in the Indonesian Islands.  I had a lot of good reasons not least that the seaside can support large populations here in particular and still does by the way.  I suspect this culture evolved there over at least five millions of years and tool development evolved at the same time.  And yes, there would be a lot of shells, most of them deep underwater.


This is where we have the long benign time line that allows all this to mature.  Now we have marked shells.  I suspect many more exist and much deeper as well.  Recall this is where we found Java man.  Thus while the transition to modern man took place in South Africa, our real prehistory is much longer and on the beach and particularly in Indonesia.  Connectivity was also far superior between these locales than the present.

.
World's Oldest Engravings Discovered on 500,000-Year-Old Shells 

December 3, 2014 | by Janet Fang


http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/worlds-oldest-engravings-discovered-500000-year-old-shells


Photo credit: Inside of the fossil Pseudodon shell (DUB7923-bL) showing that the hole made by Homo erectus is exactly at the spot where the adductor muscle is attached to the shell / Henk Caspers, Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands


Homo erectus living in Java, Indonesia, half a million years ago used freshwater shellfish for the production of tools and what appears to be art. These newly discovered engravings, described in Nature this week, are the oldest ever found.


We used to think that geometric engravings were a sure sign of modern cognitive abilities, and experts have long debated over the origins of these behaviors. “Until this discovery, it was assumed that comparable engravings were only made by modern humans—Homo sapiens—in Africa, starting about 100,000 years ago,” Josephine Joordens of Leiden University says in a news release. Not so, Asian Homo erectus appears to be fully capable of this “modern” behavior as well.


 


Analyzing hundreds of samples collected in the 1890s from the main bone layer (called Hauptknochenschicht) of the Trinil site in Java, Joordens, a large international team found evidence for the modification of the shells of a mollusk called Pseudodon. Homo erectus had a clever trick for opening these large freshwater mussels: They drilled a hole through the shell using a hard, pointed object (possibly a shark’s tooth) at exactly the spot where the muscle that keeps the shell closed is attached. These are called adductor muscles, and once damaged, the bivalves open right up. After eating the mussels, they used the empty shells to manufacture tools or as a canvas for some prehistoric doodling. The sediment in the shells date to between 430,000 and 540,000 years ago.


One of the shells has a smooth and polished edge, which indicates that it was used as a tool for cutting or scraping. Homo erectus made this shell tool by modifying the ventral margin (or underside) of a Pseudodon shell (DUB5234-DL) pictured to the right (a). Below that is a detailed look at the sharp edge (b).

Another shell has a zigzag pattern of grooves on it that’s only visible now using light from an angle. The lack of gaps between the turns of the grooves suggests that the maker paid meticulous attention to detail—not to mention, it was very difficult to replicate the pattern on both fresh and fossilized shells (the researchers tried). “We are really certain that this must have been made by an agent who did a very deliberate action with a very sharp implement,” Joordens tells Nature. Possibly with something like the shark tooth used to open the mussel. Here’s the fossilized Pseudodon shell (DUB1006-fL) with the engraving. A detailed close-up is on the right.




So, it was purposeful, but can we actually call it art? “If you don't know the intention of the person who made it, it's impossible to call it art,” she adds. “But on the other hand, it is an ancient drawing. It is a way of expressing yourself. What was meant by the person who did this, we simply don't know... It could have been to impress his girlfriend, or to doodle a bit, or to mark the shell as his own property.”


Images: Henk Caspers, Naturalis, Leiden, The Netherlands (top), Francesco d’Errico, Bordeaux University (middle), Wim Lustenhouwer, VU University Amsterdam (bottom)


No comments:

There was an error in this gadget