About Me

My Photo
May 2012 - We passed one million page views - thanks and Join already :-) September 2010 I am pleased to report that my essay titled A NEW METRIC WITH APPLICATIONS TO PHYSICS AND SOLVING CERTAIN HIGHER ORDERED DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS' has been published by Physics Essays published by the American Institute of Physics and appeared in their June 2010 quarterly. 40 years ago I took an honors degree in applied mathematics from the University of Waterloo. My interest was Relativity and my last year there saw me complete a 900 level course under Hanno Rund on his work in relativity,as well as differential geometry(pure math) and of course analysis. I continued researching new ideas and knowledge since that time and I have prepared a book for publication titled 'Paradigms Shift'. I maintain my blog as a day book and research tool to retain data and record impressions and interpretations on material read. Do take this moment to join my blog and receive Four items of interest daily Monday through Saturday. Since my topics are usually unique or at least obscure, the ads running through adsense are often interesting and worth dipping into while also supporting this blog in a small way.

Followers

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Ancient Structures




An interesting question in archeology that is been revisited by efforts around the structures in South Africa is the antiquity of ancient structures.  It is clearly a difficult one.

It begins with the reality that the human being has had the capacity to tip up stones and build monuments for as long as we have been around.  This presently works out to be optimistically as much as 250,000 years but for sure at least 70,000 years.

This means a stone monument could have been constructed deep in our past.  Yet the earliest we admit to are perhaps ten thousand years old put together by non agricultural peoples.  It could be that a stable agricultural base is a necessity.  Certainly that is one easy explanation for the lack of earlier sites.

A more reasonable explanation is site antiquity itself.  These sites were continuously used and consequently rebuilt until abandoned.  Thus the site would have been regroomed continuously.  This would remove past evidence.

Thus archeology discovers only a last period of use with any accuracy.

On top of this, most sites had no local habitation of significance, or sufficiently established to leave good garbage tips.  Recall the use of pigs to root through such tips.  All this makes dating problematic.

So it is not hard to imagine communities coming together annually and constructing a temple or monument, and then maintaining it every year for millennia.  We have not seen this behavior among hunter gatherers per se but we certainly have seen the establishment of sacred places with temporary constructs.

So we can make a reasonable assertion that stone constructs implies settled societies.  Yet any evidence will be concentrated in the last decades of that society’s presence.  There are exceptions, most notably in Mesopotamia where it was as easy to make bricks as it was to work with failed bricks. Again it is an exception.

The moment we enter the jungle where early efforts actually occurred, it becomes way more difficult and we are simply not looking very well.

1 comments:

Tia Mysoa said...

Great blog, with some interesting posts! I’ll have to come back here more often to absorb all the data.

You may find the alternative theories, concerning the ancient African stone formations, worthy of note. Have a look at my latest post http://tia-mysoa.blogspot.com/2010/08/unravelling-mystery-of-south-africas.html

Recent Comments

Networkedblogs